Controlling the ENIG Process for Optimum Efficiency and Performance

Reading time ( words)

Introduction

In last month’s Trouble in Your Tank, different levels of corrosion in the nickel deposit were presented. In addition, the suggestion was made that mid-phosphorous content EN process was more beneficial with respect to solderability, as opposed to a high phos content nickel deposit. Certainly, concerns with corrosion of the nickel (with lower phos) were allayed as long as the proper process controls were in place. Ideally, the ENIG process must provide the optimum in solder joint reliability while operating at the highest level of cost efficiency. All too often, process parameters that have the most influence on these critical attributes are poorly understood. An example of poor control is shown in Figure 1. The gold deposit has been removed in order to expose the electroless nickel surface.

It is very difficult to discern any anomalies in the nickel deposit without removing the gold. It is clear from the SEMs in Figure 1 that there is significant corrosion on the electroless nickel surface. Obviously, this is an unacceptable situation, and in order to prevent it one must work harder to optimize and control the electroless nickel-immersion gold process. Some of these factors will now be presented in detail.

Critical Electroless Nickel Features:

1. Phosphorous content control in the electroless nickel deposit. Don’t underestimate this important parameter.
2. Stabilizers in the EN solution influence phosphorous content in the deposit.
3. Phos content has strong influence on solderability, immersion gold deposit thickness and potential for hyper-corrosion.

Let’s look at these points in a little more detail.

As I have written in this monthly column on many occasions, operating the chemical processes within the process window is the key to consistent and predictable performance. After all, your customers should expect no less from you. So with respect to #1 above, it is recommended that the EN process be able to maintain a reasonably tight window with respect to phos content through five metal (MTOs) turnovers in the nickel solution.

Read the full column here.


Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the August 2014 issue of The PCB Magazine.

05/26/2023 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine

It’s been a busy week here at I-Connect007, an even busier week for PCB designers and manufacturers. This week, we published a variety of articles and news items. In this week’s wrap-up, we have an interview with Rex Rozario that is basically a historical look at the birth of commercial PCB manufacturing, and his involvement with the Rolling Stones in their early days. Then we bring you a look at trends in freight costs, which are—fortunately—heading southward right now.

04/26/2023 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team

Many companies in our industry are trying to hire new career-minded, long-term employees, but the hiring process is costly, especially if you hire someone who doesn’t work out. How do you ensure that your new hire stays on and becomes a happy, long-time employee? We recently spoke with Ventec’s Frank Lorentz about his company’s onboarding processes. Frank is the general manager of Ventec’s customer and technical service, warehouse, and quick-turn facility in Germany, and he’s made a career out of logistics. He walks us through his exhaustive onboarding process, which includes letting new hires make mistakes so that they can learn from them.

04/20/2023 | Dan Turpuseema, Altanova

Semiconductor wafer-testing interface PCBs require a fine-pitch interposer/substrate to transfer a larger pitch (greater than 0.4 mm) to a fine pitch (less than 150 mm). The interposer, which serves as the electromechanical interface between the tester and the wafer requires fine pitch, high pin count, high I/O density, and vertical compliance.